Current:Home > MarketsNorthern Ireland prosecutor says UK soldiers involved in Bloody Sunday won’t face perjury charges -Wealth Navigators Hub
Northern Ireland prosecutor says UK soldiers involved in Bloody Sunday won’t face perjury charges
View
Date:2025-04-15 02:14:08
LONDON (AP) — Fifteen British soldiers who allegedly lied to an inquiry into Bloody Sunday, one of the deadliest days of the decades-long Northern Ireland conflict, will not face perjury charges, prosecutors said Friday.
There was insufficient evidence to convict the soldiers or a former alleged member of the Irish Republican Army about their testimony before an inquiry into the 1972 killings of 13 civilians by Britain’s Parachute Regiment in Derry, also known as Londonderry, the Public Prosecution Service said.
An initial investigation into the slayings on Jan. 30, 1972 concluded the soldiers were defending themselves from a mob of IRA bombers and gunmen. But a 12-year-long inquiry concluded in 2010 that soldiers unjustifiably opened fire on unarmed and fleeing civilians and then lied about it for decades.
Families of the victims were outraged by the decision. John Kelly, whose brother Michael was killed by paratroopers, spoke for the group and called it an “affront to the rule of law.”
“Why is it that the people of Derry cannot forget the events of Bloody Sunday, yet the Parachute Regiment, who caused all of the deaths and injury on that day, apparently cannot recall it?” Kelly said. “The answer to this question is quite simple but painfully obvious: The British Army lied its way through the conflict in the north.”
Although a quarter century has passed since the Good Friday peace accord in 1998 largely put to rest three decades of violence involving Irish republican and British loyalist militants and U.K. soldiers, “the Troubles″ still reverberate. Some 3,600 people were killed — most in Northern Ireland, though the IRA also set off bombs in England.
Only one ex-paratrooper from Bloody Sunday, known as Soldier F, faces prosecution for two murders and five attempted murders. He was among the 15 soldiers who could have faced a perjury charge.
While victims continue to seek justice for past carnage, the possibility of a criminal prosecution could soon vanish.
The British government passed a Legacy and Reconciliation Bill last year that would have given immunity from prosecution for most offenses by militant groups and British soldiers after May 1. But a Belfast judge ruled in February that the bill does not comply with human rights law. The government is appealing the ruling.
Attorney Ciaran Shiels, who represents some of the Bloody Sunday families, said they would not rule out further legal action.
“It is of course regrettable that this decision has been communicated to us only today, some 14 years after the inquiry’s unequivocal findings, but less than two weeks before the effective enactment date of the morally bankrupt legacy legislation designed specifically to allow British Army veterans to escape justice for its criminal actions in the north of Ireland,” Shiels said.
Senior Public Prosecutor John O’Neill said the decision not to bring criminal charges was based on three things: accounts given by soldiers in 1972 were not admissible; much of the evidence the inquiry relied on is not available today; and the inquiry’s conclusion that testimony was false did not always meet the criminal standard of proof.
“I wish to make clear that these decisions not to prosecute in no way undermine the findings of the Bloody Sunday Inquiry that those killed or injured were not posing a threat to any of the soldiers,” O’Neill said.
veryGood! (5)
Related
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- Jillian Michaels 'would love to leave weight loss drugs behind' in 2024. Here's why.
- US warns Houthis to cease attacks on Red Sea vessels or face potential military action
- Michael Skakel, Kennedy cousin whose conviction in killing of Martha Moxley was overturned, sues investigator and town
- Kylie Jenner Shows Off Sweet Notes From Nieces Dream Kardashian & Chicago West
- Person killed by troopers in shootout on New York State Thruway
- Novak Djokovic stuns United Cup teammates by answering questions in Chinese
- Veteran celebrating 101st birthday says this soda is his secret to longevity
- Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
- Host Pat McAfee Apologizes for Aaron Rodgers' “Serious On-Air Accusation About Jimmy Kimmel
Ranking
- Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let go
- Gypsy Rose Blanchard is free from prison. Now she's everywhere.
- New Hampshire lawmakers tackle leftovers while looking forward
- GOP wants to impeach a stalwart Maine secretary who cut Trump from ballot. They face long odds
- Juan Soto praise of Mets' future a tough sight for Yankees, but World Series goal remains
- Taliban arrest women for ‘bad hijab’ in the first dress code crackdown since their return to power
- If Jim Harbaugh leaves for NFL, he more than did his job restoring Michigan football
- Those I bonds you bought when inflation soared? Here's why you may want to sell them.
Recommendation
Angelina Jolie nearly fainted making Maria Callas movie: 'My body wasn’t strong enough'
Ford recalls 113,000 F-150 vehicles for increased crash risk: See which trucks are affected
The Supreme Court is expected to determine whether Trump can keep running for president. Here’s why
California restaurant’s comeback shows how outdated, false Asian stereotype of dog-eating persists
Could your smelly farts help science?
The fastest way to lose weight? Let's shift the perspective.
The Real-Life Parent Trap: How 2 Daughters Got Their Divorced Parents Back Together
Ford is recalling more than 112,000 F-150 trucks that could roll away while parked