Current:Home > StocksJudge declines to throw out charges against Trump valet in classified documents case -Wealth Navigators Hub
Judge declines to throw out charges against Trump valet in classified documents case
View
Date:2025-04-19 22:52:40
WASHINGTON (AP) — The federal judge presiding over the classified documents case against Donald Trump refused Saturday to throw out charges against a co-defendant of the former president.
Lawyers for Walt Nauta, Trump’s personal valet, had asked U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon to dismiss the indictment against their client. They argued, among other things, that Nauta was charged because of insufficient cooperation with prosecutors’ investigation and because of a personal animus that they say prosecutors harbored against one of Nauta’s attorneys.
Special counsel Jack Smith’s team has denied all the claims, and Cannon in her four-page order Saturday said Nauta had not met the high bar required to get the case dismissed.
Nauta and another co-defendant, Mar-a-Lago property manager, Carlos De Oliveira, are accused of conspiring with Trump to conceal evidence from investigators as they sought to recover classified documents that were taken to the Palm Beach, Florida property after Trump’s presidency ended.
All three men have pleaded not guilty.
No trial date has been set in the case. Trump has also sought to dismiss the case, and Cannon pointedly noted at the conclusion of her order: “This Order shall not be construed as commenting on the merits of Defendant Trump’s Motion to Dismiss the Indictment Based on Selective and Vindictive Prosecution or on any other motion pending before the Court.”
veryGood! (32697)
Related
- Rolling Loud 2024: Lineup, how to stream the world's largest hip hop music festival
- Amazon Prime Day 2023: Save 35% on Crest Professional Effects White Strips With 59,600+ 5-Star Reviews
- Fox pays $12 million to resolve suit alleging bias at Tucker Carlson's show
- Trumpet was too loud, clarinet was too soft — here's 'The Story of the Saxophone'
- What to watch: O Jolie night
- Reddit says new accessibility tools for moderators are coming. Mods are skeptical
- What to know about the drug price fight in those TV ads
- Netflix's pop-up eatery serves up an alternate reality as Hollywood grinds to a halt
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- Shein steals artists' designs, a federal racketeering lawsuit says
Ranking
- Google unveils a quantum chip. Could it help unlock the universe's deepest secrets?
- He had a plane to himself after an 18-hour delay. What happened next was a wild ride
- Twitter vs. Threads, and why influencers could be the ultimate winners
- New Toolkit of Health Guidance Helps Patients and Care Providers on the Front Lines of Climate Change Prepare for Wildfires
- Pregnant Kylie Kelce Shares Hilarious Question Her Daughter Asked Jason Kelce Amid Rising Fame
- Damian Lillard talks Famous Daves and a rap battle with Shaq
- 'Wait Wait' for July 22, 2023: Live in Portland with Damian Lillard!
- The creator of luxury brand Brother Vellies is fighting for justice in fashion
Recommendation
Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let go
We spoil 'Barbie'
Larsa Pippen Traumatized By Michael Jordan's Comment About Her Relationship With His Son Marcus
Janet Yellen heads to China, seeking to ease tensions between the two economic powers
Meet first time Grammy nominee Charley Crockett
Petition Circulators Are Telling California Voters that a Ballot Measure Would Ban New Oil and Gas Wells Near Homes. In Fact, It Would Do the Opposite
Countries Want to Plant Trees to Offset Their Carbon Emissions, but There Isn’t Enough Land on Earth to Grow Them
Good jobs Friday